Nederlandse publicaties over klinische vraagstukken -en studies:

Bardi F, et al. Additional value of advanced ultrasonography in pregnancies with two inconclusive cell-free DNA draws. Prenatal Diagnosis sep 2022

Ruess et al. Prenatale screening op cytomegalovirus: tijd voor herevaluatie? Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Obstetrie & Gynaecologie vol.135, maart 2022

Scheffer PG, et al. Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2021 Aug 4

Henneman L, et al. Het dilemma van de keuze. Nevenbevindingen bij de NIPT. Tijdschrift voor Verloskundigen 2019;1:6-10.

Van der Steen SL, et al. Offering a choice between NIPT and invasive PND in prenatal genetic counseling: the impact of clinician characteristics on patients’ test uptake. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27:235-243.

Van Bruggen MJ, et al. Women’s decision making regarding prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy: A qualitative comparison between 2003 and 2016. Midwifery 2018;64:93-100.

Martin L, et al. Introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test: A survey among Dutch midwives about their role as counsellors. Midwifery 2018;56:1-8.

van Opstal D, et al. Origin and clinical relevance of chromosomal aberrations other than the common trisomies detected by genome-wide NIPS: results of the TRIDENT study. Genet Med. 2018; 20:480-485.

van Schendel RV, et al. Women’s Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2017;26:1348-1356

Tamminga, et al. What do people want to know about NIPT? Content analysis of questions emailed to national NIPT information websites. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37:412-415.

Oepkes D, et al. Trial by Dutch Laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing. Part I – Clinical Impact.  Prenat Diagn 2016;36:1083-1090.

Van Schendel et al. Trial by Dutch Laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing. Part II – Women’s Perspectives. Prenat Diagn 2016;36:1091-1098.

Beulen L, et al. The clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;49:721-728.

Beulen L, et al. The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:1409-16.

Henneman L, et al. NIPT: uitdagingen voor de toekomst. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A9479.

Gitsels-van der Wal JT, et al Antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: pregnant Muslim Moroccan women’s preferences. Midwifery 2015; 31:e50-7.

Gitsels-van der Wal JT, et al. A qualitative study on how Muslim women of Moroccan descent approach antenatal anomaly screening. Midwifery 2015;31:e43-9.

Mersy E, et al. Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Implementation Strategies of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Down Syndrome Screening Programmes. Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(5):260-71.

Van Lith JM, et al. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: NIPT for chromosome abnormalities should be offered to women with low a priori risk. Prenat Diagn. 2015 Jan;35(1):8-14

Henneman L, et al. Niet-Invasieve Prenatale Test (NIPT) als eerste screeningstest? Tijdschrift voor Verloskundigen 2015; 05.

Oepkes D, et al. Prenatal aneuploidy screening using cell free DNA. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. pii: S0002-9378(15)00608-0

Beulen L, et al Women’s and healthcare professionals’ preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:549-57.

Tamminga S. et al. Changing to NIPT as a first-tier screening test and future perspectives: opinions of health professionals. Prenat Diagn. 2015 Dec;35(13):1316-23

Oepkes D. et al. Benefits of contingency screening vs primary screening by cell-free DNA-testing – think again. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep 28.

Dondorp W. et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Nov;23(11):1438-50

Faas B. et al. Prenatal genetic care: debates and considerations of the past, present and future. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15(8):1101-5.

Verweij EJ. et al. Prenatale screening en de non-invasieve prenatale test: hoe denken eerstelijns verloskundigen erover? Tijdschrift voor Verloskundigen 2015;1:16-20.

Lith van J. et al. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: NIPT for chromosome abnormalities should be offered to women with low a priori risk. Prenat Diagn. 2015 Jan;35(1):8-14.

Schendel van R. et al. NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think? Prenat Diagn. 2015 Jun;35(6):598-604

Oepkes D. et al. Prenatal aneuploidy screening using cell free DNA. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):596-7

Beulen L. et al. Women’s and healthcare professionals’ preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment. Prenat Diagn. 2015 Jun;35(6):549-57

Lichtenbelt K. et al. Detection of fetal chromosomal anomalies: does nuchal translucency measurement have added value in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing? Prenat Diagn. 2015 Jul;35(7):663-8

Verweij E.J. et al. Decision making in prenatal screening: money matters. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Sep 30

[Oepkes D. et al. Counseling for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what pregnant women may want to know. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):1-5.

Beulen L. et al. The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. aug 2014

Schendel R.V. et al. Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Mar 19.

Verweij E.J. et al. Deja vu? Discussie over de non-invasieve prenatale test (NIPT) voor Nederlandse zwangeren. NTOG 2013, nr 8 Voor het gehele artikel: klik hier

Verweij E.J. etal. Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: What women want and are willing to pay. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Aug 19.

Henneman L. et alNiet-invasieve prenatale testen in Nederland Tijdschrift voor Verloskundigen juli/augustus 2013

Mersy E. et al. Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21: systematic review and report of quality and outcomes of diagnostic accuracy studies performed between 1997 and 2012. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Feb 8.

Verweij E.J. etal. European Non-Invasive Trisomy Evaluation (EU-NITE) Study: a multicenter prospective cohort study for noninvasive fetal trisomy 21 testing. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jun 22. [Epub ahead of print]

Verweij E.J. et al. Changing attitudes towards termination of pregnancy for trisomy 21 with non-invasive prenatal trisomy testing: a population-based study in Dutch pregnant women. Pren Diagn. 2013 Feb 14

Verweij et al. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: no paradigm shift, just better testing… and it is already here! Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2012″]

Go A.T. et al. Non-invasive aneuploidy detection using free fetal DNA and RNA in maternal plasma: recent progress and future possibilities Hum Reprod Update. 2011 May-Jun;17(3):372-82

Verweij E.J. etal. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Detection of Fetal Trisomy 21 in Maternal Blood: A Systematic Review. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011 Nov 17. [Epub ahead of print]

Go A.T. et al. De maternale bloedtest op foetale trisomie 21, de heilige graal binnen handbereik! NTOG 2011. 

Terug naar nederlandse publicaties ↑